You are browsing the Hong Kong website, Regulated by Hong Kong SFC (CE number: BJA907). Investment is risky and you must be cautious when entering the market.
Xiaomi SU7 Accident Raises Safety Concerns, Stock Price Drops 6%

At 10:44 PM on March 29, a Xiaomi SU7 Standard Edition was involved in an accident in Tongling, Anhui, resulting in the deaths of the driver and two passengers. At the time of the accident, the vehicle was in NOA (Navigation on Autopilot) mode, traveling at a speed of 116 km/h. After a detour due to roadwork, the car detected an obstacle and began decelerating. However, the driver took over control but was unable to avoid a collision with a concrete barrier, with the car’s speed at 97 km/h before the impact.

 

On April 1 at noon, Xiaomi issued a response, partially reconstructing the events of the accident. However, the statement did not mention the status of the vehicle's AEB (Automatic Emergency Braking) system nor address the crucial issue of the doors not opening after the crash. Later that evening, Xiaomi Motors issued another response, stating they had not yet contacted the accident vehicle and could not confirm whether the doors could open post-collision. They also explained the AEB system’s operational range, stating it is effective within a speed range of 8-135 km/h but does not apply to obstacles such as cones, water barriers, stones, or animals.

 

The incident quickly sparked widespread public discussion. Xiaomi Motors had previously attracted young consumers with its powerful and fast vehicles, but this accident led the public to reassess its safety. It also caused turbulence in the capital market. On the afternoon of April 1, Xiaomi Group’s stock price fell sharply, dropping by more than 6% during the day and closing with a 5.49% loss, resulting in a market value drop of over HK$70 billion. This change reflects investor concerns about the safety of Xiaomi’s cars and its future prospects, especially given the unprecedented doubts surrounding the car project led by Lei Jun.

 

The Future of Intelligent Driving: Reflections After the Xiaomi SU7 Accident

Since its launch, the Xiaomi SU7 has experienced its most severe collision and explosion incident, resulting in fatalities. This event has sparked industry-wide reflections on the safety of intelligent driving and raised doubts about whether it truly represents the future of automobiles. Previously, the capital market regarded Xiaomi’s car manufacturing project as a paradigm of a "cross-industry disruptor." On March 31, S&P upgraded Xiaomi’s credit rating to BBB. However, on April 1, the company’s stock price plummeted, leading to a market value loss of over HK$70 billion. This accident highlights the harsh realities of the new energy vehicle sector: while valuations are built on the halo of technology and capital enthusiasm, a single extreme incident can shake the foundation.

 

Looking back at history, intelligent electric vehicle companies have inevitably gone through "growing pains" during their development. In 2018, Tesla suffered a major stock drop due to a fatal Autopilot-related accident. In 2021, NIO faced a user trust crisis following an accident involving its NOP (Navigate on Pilot) system. Similarly, Li Auto encountered controversy over AEB (Automatic Emergency Braking) failures, prompting upgrades to its algorithms. Each painful lesson has driven improvements in industry safety standards and accelerated advancements in intelligent driving technology.

 

For Xiaomi, which has just crossed the "survival line" in car manufacturing, finding the balance between technological innovation and safety will determine whether it can establish a firm foothold in the automotive market and continue its journey forward.

Follow us
Find us on Facebook, Twitter , Instagram, and YouTube or frequent updates on all things investing.Have a financial topic you would like to discuss? Head over to the uSMART Community to share your thoughts and insights about the market! Click the picture below to download and explore uSMART app!
Disclaimers
uSmart Securities Limited (“uSmart”) is based on its internal research and public third party information in preparation of this article. Although uSmart uses its best endeavours to ensure the content of this article is accurate, uSmart does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the information of this article and is not responsible for any views/opinions/comments in this article. Opinions, forecasts and estimations reflect uSmart’s assessment as of the date of this article and are subject to change. uSmart has no obligation to notify you or anyone of any such changes. You must make independent analysis and judgment on any matters involved in this article. uSmart and any directors, officers, employees or agents of uSmart will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by any person in reliance on any representation or omission in the content of this article. The content of this article is for reference only. It does not constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation, opinion or guarantee of any securities, financial products or instruments.The content of the article is for reference only and does not constitute any offer, solicitation, recommendation, opinion or guarantee of any securities, virtual assets, financial products or instruments. Regulatory authorities may restrict the trading of virtual asset-related ETFs to only investors who meet specified requirements.
Investment involves risks and the value and income from securities may rise or fall. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
uSMART
Wealth Growth Made Easy
Open Account