Source: Yiling Strategy Research
Falling too much is not a reason to rebound and discuss the bottom, but should observe several key changes. For investors, it is more important to grasp the strongest main line in the future than to judge when the market will rebound. The rebound of growth stocks is more phased, in which sectors that can stay away from inflation in supply and demand will be more sustainable.
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates 50bp as promised, followed by, the probability of the market expecting to raise interest rates in June fell first and then rose, the Chinese and US stock markets and industrial metals rose significantly at first and then adjusted significantly, and the energy performance was better, which is in line with our judgment in last week's weekly newspaper, "Don't listen to the sound of beating leaves through the forest." The US non-farm sector remained strong in April, the gap between supply and demand in the US labor market is still large, and inflationary pressure is difficult to ease. For commodities, austerity first hits supply (production and circulation actually need more capital and credit support than consumption) before it can really affect demand. It should be pointed out that the next scenario for the US economy is stagflation, not recession. The impact order of interest rate hikes may be: stock market & gt; real economy & gt; commodities.
For overseas, there are signs that inflation could accelerate in the future:
(1) Federal Reserve Chairman Colin Powell made it clear that inflation is too high.
(2) after Biden announced the dumping of reserves in April, the current US strategic oil reserves are at their lowest level since 1990. Accordingly, the US Department of Energy has recently chosen to invite tenders to buy back 60 million barrels of oil.
(3) the European Commission requires that most EU countries stop buying Russian crude oil six months after taking measures and stop importing refined oil from Russia before the end of the year.
(4) the US Senate Judiciary Committee passed a bill against OPEC and its partners in oil-producing countries monopolizing the oil market, trying to put pressure on OPEC to increase production, but its real effect is limited.
Domestically, changes are also taking place:
(1) since the beginning of this year, the price difference between domestic and foreign thermal coal has remained high. The quantity and growth rate of China's imported thermal coal declined significantly in the first quarter. The NDRC recently raised the upper limit of port spot prices to 1155 yuan / ton.
(2) on May 4, the central bank increased the special re-loan line of 100 billion yuan to support the clean and efficient utilization of coal, which is specially used to support the development and use of coal and to enhance the capacity of coal reserves. the above measures echo President Yi Gang's speech on "maintaining price stability" at the Boao Forum for Asia on April 22nd. The thinking of the above problems is that central banks are better at influencing demand than at creating supply, and the crux of capital expenditure of domestic energy companies may lie in sustainable expectations of carbon-neutral profits rather than a shortage of cash flow; the historical experience of the price limit policy itself indicates that it can only suppress inflation in the short term, causing greater shortages and inflation risks in the medium term. Therefore, it makes sense to ease the slope of supply shocks through price limits, but it is difficult to reverse the price trend.
In the past two weeks, due to the short-term "down too much", the market "bottom already" sound incessant, we think that rather than focusing on the bottom, several important observations are more important.
1. 10Y US real interest rate has risen to 0.62%: the current real interest rate on 10Y US debt is 0.26%, which is 130bp higher than this year's low of-1.04%. In 2013, this range is 166bp, which will gradually slow down.
2. The epidemic situation has entered a new stage of normalized epidemic prevention: the provinces and cities with the highest affordability after entering the new state of epidemic prevention also have a high proportion of GDP in the country, and are expected to enter a new normal after the success of this round of zero clearance. Pay attention to Beijing and Jiangsu, which are still rising.
3. The growth rate of social finance has risen to 11.2% and maintained: "opinions on promoting urbanization with county towns as an important carrier" has been launched and stable real estate and promoting consumption are being promoted, except for "real-life" credit expansion. historically, the recovery period requires social integration to be higher than the nominal GDP growth rate of more than 2.8%, compared with 2.23% at the end of March.
The absolute inventory level and inventory growth rate of the main middle and downstream industries are at the historical high point, but the inventory of finished goods related to the upstream industry is at a historically low level, while the capacity utilization of the upstream major industries is still running at a high level. The performance of the middle and lower reaches driven by resumption of work, consumption encouragement and infrastructure construction can be expected in the short term, and the inflationary pressure is not obvious, but after the downstream inventory is digested, the contradiction between supply and demand will soon transfer to the upstream where there is no too much safety redundancy. The coming peak season of domestic energy consumption and the acceleration of overseas inflation will resonate with it at the same time. The decline in inventories in the middle and lower reaches will be a preliminary observation of rising domestic inflation. The order of recommendation for the next stage as a whole is: oil and gas, copper and aluminum, gold, oil transportation, coal, chemical fertilizer, zinc, real estate and banks. The rebound of growth stocks is more phased, in which sectors that can stay away from inflation in supply and demand will be more sustainable.
Risk hints: carbon neutralization policy restrictions are relaxed, stable growth policies fall short of expectations, and measurement errors.
In the early morning of May 5, Beijing time, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 50bp as scheduled. Subsequently, the probability that the market expected to raise interest rates in June 75bp dropped temporarily. Chinese and American stock markets, as well as energy and industrial metals in commodities rose significantly first. Subsequently, the market expects the probability of 75bp to rise in June, US stocks and industrial metals adjust significantly, while energy performs better, which is basically in line with our judgment in last week's weekly newspaper "Don't listen to the sound of beating leaves through the forest": the earliest stage of austerity may occur because of the impact of financial properties, industrial metals sometimes have a more obvious decline compared to energy. More sensitive to higher interest rates are the capital markets: inflation-adjusted valuations of the Nasdaq and S & P 500 are already at their highest levels since 2002, and US stocks will be at extremely high valuation risk if interest rates rise sharply to curb inflation in the future.
The impact order of interest rate hikes may be: stock market & gt; real economy & gt; commodities.
The strong performance of non-farmers in April, revealed this week, is another sign that local business activity is still improving.
At the same time, we also note that the labor force participation rate decreased month-on-month in April, although there may be differences in the survey caliber between the non-farm employment data and the non-farm payrolls data, but at present, the number of non-farm job vacancies and the vacancy rate in the United States are still at an all-time high. This means that the gap between supply and demand in the US labor market is still large. At the same time, taking into account: for commodities, tightening is the first impact on supply (production and circulation actually need more capital and credit support than consumption) before it can really affect demand, which may still increase inflationary pressures in the future. Investors need to be reminded again that in this context, the next change in overheating is stagflation, not recession.
Whether direct or indirect evidence, global inflationary pressures are emerging. For overseas:
(1) at a press conference after the Fed's interest rate meeting in May, Federal Reserve Chairman Colin Powell opened his remarks with Inflation is much too high in the United States.
(2) after Biden announced the dumping of 180 million barrels in April, we noticed that during this round of "dumping", there was the most serious deviation in history between crude oil prices and strategic crude oil stocks, while the current strategic oil reserves in the United States are at their lowest level since 1990. Accordingly, according to the official website of the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Energy recently began to tender to buy back 60 million barrels of oil.
(3) according to the official website of the European Commission, European Commission President von de Lane proposed a sixth round of sanctions against Russia. Most EU countries must stop buying Russian crude oil six months after taking measures. And stop importing refined oil from Russia by the end of this year.
(4) with the high price of crude oil and the slow production of OPEC, the US Senate Judiciary Committee passed a bill against OPEC and its partners in oil-producing countries monopolizing the oil market (which has been discussed for more than 20 years), trying to put pressure on OPEC to increase production, but its real effect is limited.
As far as domestic is concerned, we have also paid attention to the corresponding changes:
(1) since the beginning of this year, the price difference between domestic and foreign thermal coal has remained high, and the quantity and growth rate of imported thermal coal in China have declined significantly in the first quarter. Accordingly, the price control of coal has also been adjusted: according to the e-interactive information of Baofeng Energy Shanghai Stock Exchange, on January 28, the guiding price of the National Development and Reform Commission requires that the price of thermal coal pit should not exceed 700 yuan / ton, and the port price should not exceed 900 yuan / ton. In the notice on further improving the price formation mechanism in the coal market issued by the National Development and Reform Commission on February 25, the reasonable range of medium-and long-term trading prices in key areas was made clear, and further, in the announcement on defining the price-raising behavior of operators in the coal field issued on April 30 The NDRC further clarified the upper limit of spot prices (no more than 50 per cent of the reasonable range of medium-and long-term trading prices), raising the upper limit of port spot prices to 1155 yuan / ton, while pit prices have also been raised from 700yuan / ton. Especially in Shaanxi and Shanxi (the upper limit is more than 700 yuan / ton), and there is also room for policy (to maintain a certain degree of flexibility, allowed for legitimate reasons). The price control policy was implemented many times in the United States in the 1970s, which is effective in the short term and will accelerate the shortage and lead to higher inflation in the medium-term dimension. In the future, the regulation of energy prices will exist for a long time, but the need to dynamically coincide with the law of supply and demand can only delay the upward trend of inflation.
(2) on May 4, the central bank increased the special re-loan line of 100 billion yuan to support the clean and efficient utilization of coal, which is specially used to support the development and use of coal and enhance the coal reserve capacity. The above measures echo President Yi Gang's speech on "maintaining price stability" at the Boao Forum for Asia on April 22. However, in the face of upward global inflationary pressures, it may be difficult to be immune at home. It may seem like input pressure, but more efforts may be required on demand, and the practical effect of using these structured tools may be relatively limited: under the established "carbon neutralization" goal, taking into account the new production capacity and profit cycle, the possibility of entrepreneurs blindly carrying out capital expenditure because of short-term high profits may not be high, and major enterprises pay large dividends at this stage, not a financial problem.
In the past two weeks, due to the short-term "falling too much", there have been a lot of voices about the "bottom" of the market, but we are more cautious than before, it is not pessimistic, but in fact, we have calculated before, the whole market is not in the historical extreme valuation (2014) scenario, then there needs to be more "victory rate" signals. So it is nothing more than a slowdown in overseas tightening and a resurgence of epidemic control and demand. We provide several observations from three perspectives:
We observe that the 13-year real interest rate on US debt has gone through a process from negative to positive, gradually falling from a low of-0.74% to a high of 0.92%, with an upward range of 166bp; the highest real interest rate of 18-year US debt is 1.17%. The slope and magnitude of the rise are relatively slow. The current real interest rate is 0.26%, which is 130bp higher than the lowest point of this year-1.04%. From the range, the sharp rise in real interest rates may be nearing the end of the stage, while from an absolute height, there may still be some room to rise, and the real interest rate of about 0.62% is a tipping point. In the future, as real interest rates continue to rise, the crackdown on the financial attributes of industrial metals is likely to weaken gradually. However, it may also be difficult to relieve the pressure on NASDAQ and the domestic growth stocks associated with it.
On May 5, the standing Committee of the political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee set the tone: unswervingly adhere to the general policy of dynamic zero clearance. At present, the increase in the whole country has declined, but we need to enter the steady state of some new normal. According to our calculations, if we use the average ranking of per capita GDP and per capita general public budget income as a measure of affordability after entering the new epidemic prevention state, we find that the provinces and cities at the top in the above rankings account for a relatively high proportion of GDP in the country, which means that as long as the above-mentioned areas achieve phased dynamic zero clearance, or all enter the end of a sharp decline in new growth, then the impact of the epidemic on economic expectations will reach an inflection point.
As we have mentioned in previous reports, under the set growth targets, the fundamental scenario for the future should be a 2020 "American mirror", and part of the impact of the epidemic on the economy may be difficult to reverse. But it can be improved: the economic growth path may be more focused on investment and physical consumption to compensate for the loss of services.
The CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued the opinions on promoting urbanization with County towns as an important Carrier to promote urban and rural construction, which further defines the path for the future, which is in line with our previous hypothesis. it is also in line with the rural revitalization that we have emphasized since the beginning of the year. So now all that's left is to see "live ammunition".
All the short-term demand upside comes from credit and balance sheet expansion, so we need to see that the growth rate of social finance continues to rise and the gap between the growth rate of social finance stock and nominal GDP growth continues to widen. Historically, during the recovery, the growth rate of social integration stock tends to be more than 2.8 per cent higher than that of nominal GDP, compared with 2.23 per cent at the end of March and needs to be maintained at more than 11.2 per cent in the future.
As we mentioned in a series of reports, the current state of the industrial chain is: after experiencing the downward trend of China's economic cycle and the supply chain blockage caused by the epidemic, the absolute inventory level and inventory growth rate of major mid-and downstream industries are at historical highs, while the inventory of finished goods related to upstream industries is at a historically low level, while capacity utilisation in major upstream industries is still running high. Therefore, when the impact of the epidemic recedes from its peak in the future, the performance of the middle and lower reaches driven by resumption of work, consumption encouragement and infrastructure construction can be expected in the short term, and the inflationary pressure is not obvious, but after the downstream inventory is digested, the contradiction between supply and demand will soon shift to the upstream where there is not too much safety redundancy. Therefore, the decline in inventories in the middle and lower reaches will be an important observation of rising domestic inflation.
The peak season of energy consumption is coming. In summer, residential electricity demand will gradually rise in the future, and the certainty of energy consumption will pick up. At the same time, with the gradual acceleration of work resumption after the control of the epidemic, the two types of demand may resonate.
In a market where risk compensation is not high, there seems to be no need for excessive fear or greed because of the ups and downs of the market itself. For A-share investors, compared with singing "Battle Song", it is better to see the "dashboard".
Rather than judging when the market is at the bottom, it is more important to grasp the strongest main line in the future. Time may not be an "enemy" for emerging industries at the moment, but it is a friend of traditional industries.
Our previous view was that short-term growth rebound investors can take the opportunity to participate, but we also suggest that investors seize the switching window and adjust the layout to meet the trend of inflation. Sectors in growth stocks where demand and costs are away from the effects of inflation (such as military industry and computers) will prevail.
In terms of allocation, energy is deterministic, metals have demand elasticity, and real estate and banks also have obvious opportunities for industry improvement.The order of recommendation for the next stage as a whole is: oil and gas, copper and aluminum, gold, oil transportation, coal, chemical fertilizer, zinc, real estate and banks.
1) the restrictions on carbon neutralization policy are relaxed. If the carbon neutralization policy restrictions are relaxed, the supply-side constraints of cyclical plates will be greatly relaxed.
2) the policy of stabilizing growth falls short of expectations. If the policy of stabilizing growth falls short of expectations, the probability of economic demand stabilizing and rebounding will be very low, and the expectation of profit improvement in sectors more related to economic output will be falsified.
3) calculation error. The numerical model is the fitting of history, and there are errors in the fitting itself. in addition, the statistical samples themselves may also cause errors in the calculation results.