奈雪IPO:仍未收到聆訊通知,估值或達400億元
“奈雪已通過港交所聆訊”,昨日一則消息讓資本市場再次炸開了鍋。距離奈雪的茶(以下簡稱“奈雪”)提交招股書已過去3個月,其IPO進程中的一舉一動也不停牽動着外界的神經。不過奈雪方面很快否認了這一說法。
一位接近奈雪的機構人士表示,截至目前,奈雪方面仍未收到港交所的聆訊通知。目前可以確認的是,奈雪在上週已向港交所提交了最新一版問詢回覆。一位參與了路演的機構人士預測,奈雪估值或將達到350至400億元人民幣。 (新浪財經)
Follow us
Find us on
Facebook,
Twitter ,
Instagram, and
YouTube or frequent updates on all things investing.Have a financial topic you would like to discuss? Head over to the
uSMART Community to share your thoughts and insights about the market! Click the picture below to download and explore uSMART app!

Disclaimers
uSmart Securities Limited (“uSmart”) is based on its internal research and public third party information in preparation of this article. Although uSmart uses its best endeavours to ensure the content of this article is accurate, uSmart does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the information of this article and is not responsible for any views/opinions/comments in this article. Opinions, forecasts and estimations reflect uSmart’s assessment as of the date of this article and are subject to change. uSmart has no obligation to notify you or anyone of any such changes. You must make independent analysis and judgment on any matters involved in this article. uSmart and any directors, officers, employees or agents of uSmart will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by any person in reliance on any representation or omission in the content of this article. The content of this article is for reference only. It does not constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation, opinion or guarantee of any securities, financial products or instruments.The content of the article is for reference only and does not constitute any offer, solicitation, recommendation, opinion or guarantee of any securities, virtual assets, financial products or instruments. Regulatory authorities may restrict the trading of virtual asset-related ETFs to only investors who meet specified requirements.
Investment involves risks and the value and income from securities may rise or fall. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.